From: Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:25:46 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow hand-editing of patches before sending
Message-ID: <20061103132546.GA21202@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <b0943d9e0611030516v43a25b76y4c07f82b33411a6e@mail.gmail.com>

On 2006-11-03 13:16:08 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> On 03/11/06, Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com> wrote:
>
> > Or try to use the git plumbing directly, if reasonable. Mail
> > encoding and decoding isn't my idea of fun -- I just want it to
> > not break. And I don't see much point in StGIT replicating core
> > GIT functionality when there's no reason to.
>
> As I said in my reply to Junio, I really like to keep the e-mail
> templates functionality of StGIT. This is not available in
> git-format-patch.

Fair enough. How about e-mail importing -- is there a good reason to
not use the git plumbing there?

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com