From: Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:51:06 GMT
Subject: Re: git bug? + question
Message-ID: <20061103095106.GB16721@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20061103042540.192bbd18.seanlkml@sympatico.ca>

On 2006-11-03 04:25:40 -0500, Sean wrote:

> Yeah.. Although fetching multiple remotes makes more sense as an
> optimization, especially when using a separate remotes namespace.

That's what "git fetch" is for. :-)

> Perhaps the real confusion is created because the only porcelain
> level merge command current in Git is "git pull .". A separate name
> might make things easier to grasp.

Indeed. Having pull = fetch + merge and not having a porcelain merge
command is not good, usability-wise. As is, one _has_ to learn the
weird ways of pull even if one is only interested in using separate
commands to fetch and merge.

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com