From: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 08:21:52 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added description for reversing git-update-index using --index-info
Message-ID: <200611030821.54350.andyparkins@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vfyd1mew3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Friday 2006 November 03 02:40, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > +git ls-tree -r HEAD | git update-index --index-info
>
> While this is correct in the mechanical sense, it _sucks_ as an
> example, especially since you do not mention that the user would
> most likely need to do 'git update-index --refresh' afterwards
> to make the result useful.

I'm happy to ditch it if you wish; I included it only because it was one of 
the examples that Shawn gave me in my original question.

Would you like a new patch?


Andy

-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIEE