From: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:56:35 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Teach receive-pack how to keep pack files when unpacklooseobjects = 0.
Message-ID: <20061031065635.GC7375@spearce.org>
In-Reply-To: <7vwt6hq8nu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
> 
> >> Because that approach assumes recieve-pack and unpack-objects
> >> and index-pack are from the same vintage (otherwise your
> >> receive-pack would need to have a way to see if unpack-objects
> >> and index-pack would grok --pack_header argument), we could even
> >> get away without passing the pack version if we wanted to.
> >...
> > BTW I think we do need to pass the pack version in the option.
> 
> We are in agreement; I mentioned "we could ... if we wanted to"
> because I wanted to see if you are paying attention ;-).

Hah.  Trying to keep me on my toes aren't you.  :-)

I almost have the change finished. I'll send it before I go to bed.

--