From: Petr Baudis Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 02:08:42 GMT Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Message-ID: <20061027020842.GZ20017@pasky.or.cz> In-Reply-To: <200610270202.k9R22Wxf004208@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> Dear diary, on Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 04:02:32AM CEST, I got a letter where "Horst H. von Brand" said that... > Jakub Narebski wrote: > > 7. Checkouts (as a noun). This probably read "Support Centralized and > > Disconnected Centralized Workflow" but that is perhaps too wordy. Git would > > have "No" for "Centralized" > > Why? We could all agree that some repository is "central" and all push/pull > there. Or send patches by mail (or apply them via ssh). Sure, it's not CVS, > but... An ability to configure the tool so that the centralized workflow is _enforced_ may be important for managers. It's stupid, but it's what is meant there, I think. > > 19. Ease of Use. Hmmm... I don't know for Git. I personally find it very > > easy to use, but I have not much experiences with other SCM. I wonder why > > Bazaar has "No" there... > > Extremely subjective. Easy to learn doesn't cut it either. I don't think this column makes sense at all. I swear I've seen *several* people that claimed GNU Arch was easy to learn/use for them!