From: Matthew L Foster Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:23:16 GMT Subject: git and time Message-ID: <20060926232316.98065.qmail@web51009.mail.yahoo.com> After seeing how git currently accepts a remote repository's timestamp it occurred to me that git should probably instead prefer the time a particular changeset was committed to _this_ repository. Perhaps I don't know enough about git but it seems to me the important information is when a particular changeset was committed to this repository, all other remote/sub/parent repositories' timestamps are secondary (or at least should be tracked separately). -Matt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com