From: Jeff King Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 07:34:52 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] git-commit.sh: convert run_status to a C builtin Message-ID: <20060908073452.GA25343@coredump.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <7v64fynbpg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:56:11PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I just wanted to point it out because I felt the names to > programmers are slightly different matter. Fair enough. Do you want to change git-runstatus? It should ideally not be used by end users at all (and hopefully can eventually go away if git-status and git-commit become builtins). > > wt_status? ucu_status (updated, changed, untracked)? > Yeah, something along those lines. I think wt_status is the most reasonable of those. > In a distant past I saw some terminals get confused near the > edge if you do that, but these days everybody is on some sort of > Xterm so it may not matter. But that would probably be nice to > fix. OK, it will take a little wrangling with the color_printf interface, but it should be doable. > > OK. Besides the things you mentioned, what improvements would you like > > to see? > Besides the things I mentioned? I dunno offhand -- otherwise I > would have mentioned them ;-). Heh. OK, I assumed your previous comment hinted at hidden depths of dissatisfaction, but clearly not. :) Patches forthcoming... -Peff