From: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:08:07 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC] adding support for md5
Message-ID: <20060824080807.GG25247@spearce.org>
In-Reply-To: <7vac5ubn57.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
> 
> >> > What about all of those memcpy(a, b, 20)'s?  :-)
> >> 
> >> Surely.  If you are inclined to, go wild.
> >
> > Like this?  :-)
> 
> Except some minor nits, yes.
> 
>  * I would have preferred two patches, one for "master" and one
>    for the C merge-recursive topic (or at least "next").

Doh.  I didn't realize this was something you were interested in
pulling into master.  Otherwise I would have done this.  Next time
I'll try to keep that in mind.
 
>  * You missed a few in "master".

Not surprising since I typically work against and use next.
 
>  * The cast in the second hunk in combine-diff.c was wrong;
>    breakage was caught by our testsuite.

OK, that's just flat out stupid of me.  I apologize for making you
fix my mistakes.  :-)

> I've pushed out a fixed up result in "master" and "next".

Thanks.

-- 
Shawn.