From: Qingning Huo <qhuo@mayhq.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:40:03 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Invoke git-repo-config directly.
Message-ID: <20060315204003.GA6154@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603141506130.3618@g5.osdl.org>

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 03:07:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Qingning Huo wrote:
> > We have "git-read-tree" and "git repo-config" at the same time.  Are
> > there any rules saying which form should be preferred?  How about pick
> > one form and stick to it?
> 
> I agree that it is inconsistent as-is. So a patch to make it use the 
> "git-repo-config" form (the argument being that internally, we use the 
> full names) might be good if just for consistency.
> 

Can these two patches be accepted then?  What do others think?

Qingning