From: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:44:43 GMT
Subject: Re: What's in git.git
Message-ID: <20060310104443.GA4491@c165.ib.student.liu.se>
In-Reply-To: <46a038f90603060105m29595745ke64d4a623506c0b0@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:05:41PM +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On 3/6/06, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> > - The deathmatch between annotate/blame (Ryan Anderson, Fredrik
> >   Kuivinen, me cheerleading)
> 
> Add fuel to the fire  ;-) Can git-blame take cached git-rev-list
> output like annotate does with -S?
> 

Currently it cannot do that. How is that option used? If you want to
make annotate/blame faster for certain files you might as well cache
the output of annotate/blame instead of the git-rev-list output, no?

What am I missing?

- Fredrik