From: Alexander Litvinov <lan@ac-sw.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:28:04 GMT
Subject: Re: RFC: Subprojects
Message-ID: <200601161328.04985.lan@ac-sw.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vacdzkww3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Saturday 14 January 2006 14:59, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Now I'll think aloud about a completely different design.
>
> We could simply overlay the projects.  I think this is what
> Johannes suggested earlier.
>
> You keep one branch for each "subproject", and make commits into
> each branch (i.e. if you modified files for the upstream kernel,
> the change is committed to the branch for linux-2.6 subproject),
> but when checking things out, you do an equivalent of octopus
> merge across subprojects.
If I cleary understand this idea it is NOT that I dreaming about. Almost all 
our sub-projects are used in more than one project (imaging network layer 
library). So variant with gitlink is that I willing.