From: Peter Eriksen <s022018@student.dtu.dk>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:39:22 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] git-prune: never lose objects reachable from our refs.
Message-ID: <20051209193922.GA31228@ebar091.ebar.dtu.dk>
In-Reply-To: <7vmzja91gp.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:25:10PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Explicit <head> arguments to git-prune replaces, instead of
> extends, the list of heads used for reachability analysis by
> fsck-objects.  By giving a subset of heads by mistake, objects
> reachable only from other heads can be removed, resulting in a
> corrupted repository.
> 
> This commit stops replacing the list of heads, and makes the
> command line arguments to add to them instead for safety.

Shouldn't the first sentence be "Explicit <head> arguments to git-prune
extends, instead of replaces,...", that is, interchange the words 
extends and replaces?  Did I miss something?

Peter