From: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:42:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH rev-list.c] max-count in terms of intersection
Message-ID: <20051118224233.50766.qmail@web31805.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <7v1x1dha6x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>


--- Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:

> Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com> writes:
> 
> > diff-tree 768b79de9eadc38a839332df0fcce021f7174d6d (from
> 2e67a5f449f4026097494569f871d79bf263ab28)
> > tree 6403fc730f8d5843043788f4c2f466727ba94bc0
> > parent 2e67a5f449f4026097494569f871d79bf263ab28
> > author Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com> 1132349344 -0500
> > committer Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com> 1132349344 -0500
> >
> >     [PATCH rev-list.c] max-count in terms of intersection
> >     
> 
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches, perhaps?

Sorry, I just saw this document existed for GIT too.
Would you like me to resubmit?

> >     When a path designation is given, max-count counts the number
> >     of commits therein (intersection), not globally.
> 
> This makes sense, but I wonder if the same logic applies to
> max_age as well.  If we have clock-skewed commits that are
> skipped by the DENSE processing, we probably do not want them to
> be affecting what to do on the commits that matter.

As far as I understand it, I think max-age is fine the way
it is.  After all, max-age depends on date/time which is
absolute (i.e. applies to commits in the whole set and in
the intersection just the same).

    Luben