From: Sam Ravnborg Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 19:05:00 GMT Subject: Re: Moved files and merges Message-ID: <20050903190500.GB8379@mars.ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <7vy86erntu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:46:53AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > This is a simplified scenario of klibc vs klibc-kbuild HPA had > trouble with, to help us think of a way to solve this > interesting merge problem. > > #1 - #3 - #5 - #7 > / / / > #0 - #2 - #4 - #6 > > There are two lines of developments. #0->#2 renames F to G and > introduces K. #0->#1 keeps F as F and does not introduce K. As explained in another mail what we want to do is actually to transpose the changes made to F to the now renamed file G. So we end up with G containing the modifications made to F. Also we want to include the new file K. So we end up with a new commit containing the renamed file with modifications and the new files too. I hope this simplfies the usecase from a git perspective. Sam