From: Carl Baldwin Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:47:36 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC] undo and redo Message-ID: <20050824204736.GA13194@hpsvcnb.fc.hp.com> In-Reply-To: This is interesting. Can a ref be to a tree rather than a commit? And it still works? I guess it would. I hadn't thought about that. Will prune preserve any tree mentioned in any file in refs? How does this work exactly? Cheers, Carl On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 04:44:48PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Carl Baldwin wrote: > > > This brings up a good point (indirectly). "git prune" would destroy the > > undo objects. I had thought of this but decided to ignore it for the > > time being. > > If you made undo store the tree under refs somewhere, git prune would > preserve it. > > -Daniel > *This .sig left intentionally blank* > -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Carl Baldwin Systems VLSI Laboratory Hewlett Packard Company MS 88 work: 970 898-1523 3404 E. Harmony Rd. work: Carl.N.Baldwin@hp.com Fort Collins, CO 80525 home: Carl@ecBaldwin.net - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -