From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:14:20 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tagger id
Message-ID: <20050712151420.GC15794@pasky.ji.cz>
In-Reply-To: <m14qb012x4.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>

Dear diary, on Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 05:04:23PM CEST, I got a letter
where "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> told me that...
> > By the way, I do not particularly like the name "git-id".  There
> > could be IDs for different kinds (not just people) we would want
> > later (file IDs, for example).  Naming what you are computing
> > _the_ "id" feels a bit too generic.  I do not have a better
> > alternative to suggest, though.
> 
> Agreed.  Something like git-author or git-author-stamp is probably
> better.

Since that "infriges" the author/committer distinction, I would prefer
git-person-id.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
<Espy> be careful, some twit might quote you out of context..