From: Petr Baudis Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 07:28:47 GMT Subject: Re: Problem with cogito and Linux tree tags Message-ID: <20050603072847.GC16619@pasky.ji.cz> In-Reply-To: <429F92CA.9060908@gorzow.mm.pl> Dear diary, on Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 01:14:18AM CEST, I got a letter where Radoslaw Szkodzinski told me that... > Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote: > > >Dan Holmsand wrote: > > > > > > > >>$ git-cat-file tag 06f6d9e2f140466eeb41e494e14167f90210f89d > >> > >>which tells you that v2.6.12-rc5 is commit > >>2a24ab628aa7b190be32f63dfb6d96f3fb61580a > >> > >> > >> > >Ok. This doesn't work too. That cogito version really works fine, but I > >had that branch cloned from a local repository gotten from rsync and > >probably that's the problem. > >The tags weren't propagated, but they should be. > > > >AstralStorm > > > > > Well, new cogito-0.11.1 (300ab153620d2492e824cb3561c32debb5e80bf8) has > this fixed and picked up missing objects automatically. Oh yes, I wanted to mention it in this thread but forgot. However note that what it does now is awful and it's just a quick'n'dirty fix to make it mostly work. I guess a better way would be to teach the pull tools to download refs/ files too and do the proper dependency things from them too (in addition to the passed commit id). I will need to go back and look again at the set of Daniel's patches which implemented something like that. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor