From: Ryan Anderson Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 22:19:22 GMT Subject: Re: I want to release a "git-1.0" Message-ID: <20050530221922.GC21076@mythryan2.michonline.com> In-Reply-To: On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 01:00:42PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I think I'll move the "cvs2git" script thing to git proper before the 1.0 > release (again, in order to have the tutorial able to show what to do if > you already have an existing CVS tree), what else? Umm, why do you maintain two seperate "git" related trees? Why not merge all of git-tools in, in a tools/ subdirectory? I've been meaning to ask the same question about "gitweb" for that matter. The distributions that want seperate packages for dependency reasons can handle that easily inside one tree, anyway, I believe. I'd guess part of this is a holdover from the fact that you needed an independent tree for BitKeeper, but does it still make sense? -- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere