From: Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@stud.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:16:15 GMT
Subject: Re: gitweb wishlist
Message-ID: <20050524201615.GB25606@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <429383D6.6010908@cobite.com>

Hello,

> There is something strange about 'cvs import' I believe which causes 
> various bizarre things to happen to the first cvsps patchset.  I haven't 
> looked at mutt cvs yet, but this could be the cause.  If you see a lot 
> of version numbers 1.1.1.1 then this is indeed the problem.

yes, that is happening. But it should be fairly easy to fix that.
Because the second one says INITIAL->1.1 and the first says 1.1->1.1.1.1
a lot.

> I'll look at taking these patches upstream.  The 'MT' fix is already in 
> my cvs of cvsps, and the rest looks pretty good.

Good. :-)

> Do you know where I can get attribution information for these changes? 
> Are they all from you? (I'm not familiar with debian at all)

none of them is from me, they're all from Debian. Here are a few URLs
how to get the attribution:

http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cvsps.html
	-> You can get the source files from there: DSC are
	metainformation, ORIG is your upstream version and DIFF are the
	debian changes against your upstream version as patch. There is
	also a Changelog in the diff for the package. You should find in
	there everything you need.

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=cvsps
	-> The bug tracking system of debian could also be of help.


	Thomas