From: Thomas Glanzmann Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 21:41:15 GMT Subject: Alternate Patch: [PATCH] Don't include device number in cache invalidation when running on NFS Message-ID: <20050522214115.GD23388@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> In-Reply-To: <20050522212312.GC23388@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hello, * Thomas Glanzmann [050522 23:24]: > Hello, > > Sorry, I meant "rename", not "link", and yes, it should be NFS-safe. It's > > how all the mailers do things too, afaik. > okay. I will doublecheck that and come back. yes, you're right. While reading liblockfile I saw the following: /* * See if the directory where is certain file is in * is located on an NFS mounted volume. */ static int is_nfs(const char *file) { char dir[1024]; char *s; struct stat st; strncpy(dir, file, sizeof(dir)); if ((s = strrchr(dir, '/')) != NULL) *s = 0; else strcpy(dir, "."); if (stat(dir, &st) < 0) return 0; return ((st.st_dev & 0xFF00) == 0); } So here comes an alternate patch if you like to verify the st_dev for non NFS stuff. Also tested. [PATCH] Don't include device number in cache invalidation when running on NFS This patches includes the device number only in the cache invalidation process when not running on a NFS volume. Signed-off-by: Thomas Glanzmann diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c --- a/read-cache.c +++ b/read-cache.c @@ -65,8 +65,11 @@ int ce_match_stat(struct cache_entry *ce if (ce->ce_uid != htonl(st->st_uid) || ce->ce_gid != htonl(st->st_gid)) changed |= OWNER_CHANGED; - if (ce->ce_dev != htonl(st->st_dev) || - ce->ce_ino != htonl(st->st_ino)) + /* Only include device number if not running on NFS */ + if (ce->ce_dev != htonl(st->st_dev) && + ((st->st_dev & 0xFF00) == 0)) + changed |= INODE_CHANGED; + if (ce->ce_ino != htonl(st->st_ino)) changed |= INODE_CHANGED; if (ce->ce_size != htonl(st->st_size)) changed |= DATA_CHANGED;