From: Petr Baudis Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 15:03:56 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Resurrect diff-tree-helper -R Message-ID: <20050514150356.GK3905@pasky.ji.cz> In-Reply-To: <7voebe63zs.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Dear diary, on Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:33:11AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano told me that... > Another possibility. How about generating the following _only_ > when mode changes (including create and delete), even for human > consumption? There will be _no_ such line when mode or type > does not change. > > # mode: 100644 100755 path/to/a/file/that/changed/mode > # mode: 100644 120000 path/to/a/file/that/changed/to/symlink > # mode: 100644 100644 path/to/a/file/with/no/mode/change > # mode: . 100644 path/to/a/new/file > # mode: 100644 . path/to/a/deleted/file > > This is not "something like this", but a proposal for the exact > output format specification (I am going to code immediately). > Each token above is separated with exactly one ' ' (ASCII 0x20) > each, and such a line comes immediately before the patch for the > file. Showing both mode bits is to prepare for the case you > would want to apply the patch in reverse. > > This is for machine consumption and there is no need to force > them to parse out -> and (), so I dropped them. And mode or > type change happens so rarely, it would be OK for human > consumption if we show these garbage (from human point of view) > only when things change. Can you parse this, or do you always > want to have them even if nothing changes? > > Let's see how this would look like to humans. For humans I'd say "Mode change" instead of "mode" would be better, and for machines I still think "@" would be better than "#". "#" can occur quite naturally in some code snippets or whatever pasted to the commit message, which is extremely unlikely for "@". What are the advantages of "#"? I like the rest. That's basically what I've imagined, and without the arrows it's even better. :-) -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor