From: Petr Baudis Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 12:10:09 GMT Subject: Re: First web interface and service API draft Message-ID: <20050422121009.GA7173@pasky.ji.cz> In-Reply-To: <1114166517.3233.4.camel@localhost> Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 12:41:56PM CEST, I got a letter where Christian Meder told me that... > Hi, Hi, > / > > Ok. The URI should start by stating the project name > e.g. /linux-2.6. This does bloat the URI slightly but I don't think > that we want to have one root namespace per git archive in the long > run. Additionally you can always put rewriting or redirecting rules at > the root level for additional convenience when there's an obvious > default project. > > Should provide some meta data, stats, etc. if available. I don't think this makes much sense. I think you should just apply -p1 to all the directories, and define that there should be some / page which should contain some metadata regarding the repository you are accessing (probably branches, tags, and such). > ------- > //blob/ > //commit/ > > These are the easy ones: the web interface should be able to spit out > the plain text data of a blob and a commit at these URIs. Users would > be probably scripts and other downloads. > Open questions: > * Blob data should be probably binary ? What do you mean by binary? > * Should it be commit or changeset ? Linus seems to have changed > nomenclature in the REAME We call it commit everywhere but in the README. :-) The "changeset" name is bad anyway. It is a commit of a complete tree state, diff against one of its parent commits is the set of changes. > ------- > //tree/ > > Tree objects are served in binary form. Primary audience are scripts, > etc. Human beings will probably get a heart attack when they > accidentally visit this URI. Binary form is unusable for scripts. Anything wrong with putting ls-tree output there? We should also have /gitobj/ for fetching the raw git objects. > ------- > //blob/.html > //commit/.html > //tree/.html > > A HTML version of blob, commit and tree fully linked aimed at human > beings. How can I imagine an "HTML version of blob"? > ------- > //tree//diff//html > > Non recursive HTML view of the objects which are contained in the diff > fully linked with the individual HTML views. Why not .html? > ------- > //changelog/ I'd personally prefer /log/, but whatever. For consistency, I'd stay with the plaintext output by default, .html if requested. And I think abusing directories for this is bad. Query string seems much more appropriate, since this is something that changes dynamically a lot, not a permanent resource identifier. OTOH, I'd use /log/ to specify what commit to start at. It just does not make sense otherwise, you would not know where to start. I think the should follow the same or similar rules as Cogito id decoding. E.g. to get latest Linus' changelog, you'd do /log/linus > ------- > //changelog//search/ > > HTML changelog for the given filtered by the . > > * again plain version needed ? > > ------ > //changelog//search/author/ > //changelog//search/committer/ > //changelog//search/signedoffby/ > > convenience wrappers for generic search restricted to these fields. Same here. just ?author=...&committer=...&signedoffby=... etc. You can even combine several criteria. > ------ > > open questions: > * how to generate and publish additional merge information ? I don't understand.... > * how to generate and publish tree and blob history information ? This > is probably expensive with git. ...this either. > * how to represent branches ? should we code up the branches in the > project id like linux-2.6-mm or whatever ? See above. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor