From: Petr Baudis Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 20:05:04 GMT Subject: Re: Change "pull" to _only_ download, and "git update"=pull+merge? Message-ID: <20050420200504.GB19112@pasky.ji.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050420070157.GA12584@elte.hu> Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 09:01:57AM CEST, I got a letter where Ingo Molnar told me that... > [...] > fatal: unable to execute 'gitmerge-file.sh' > fatal: merge program failed Pure stupidity of mine, I forgot to add gitmerge-file.sh to the list of scripts which get installed. > another thing: it's confusing that during 'git pull', the rsync output > is not visible. Especially during large rsyncs, it would be nice to see > some progress. So i usually use a raw rsync not 'git pull', due to this. Fixed. For further reference, you can also set RSYNC_FLAGS and put whatever pleases you there. > yet another thing: what is the canonical 'pasky way' of simply nuking > the current files and checking out the latest tree (according to > .git/HEAD). Right now i'm using a script to: > > read-tree $(tree-id $(cat .git/HEAD)) > checkout-cache -a > > (i first do an 'rm -f *' in the working directory) > > i guess there's an existing command for this already? git cancel -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor