From: Matt Graham <mdg149@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:42:13 GMT
Subject: Re: Best CI Server for Git?
Message-ID: <1c5969370902021642v4e8d93djd22d5caa4aa9d1a9@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c115fd3c0902021258i61a04f74u481ba66c645fe8f5@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 15:58, Tim Visher <tim.visher@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm setting up a CI environment for my team and I'm wondering what CI
> Server works best with Git.  I'm actively considering Hudson and
> Cruise Control and I'm leaning towards Hudson because of a demo I saw
> Andrew Glover do at my local JUG.  It looks like it's not really
> 'officially' supported in either tool…

Hudson leaves a fair amount to be implemented by plug-ins, so not
being installed out of the box doesn't really imply bad.  I would say
that there are more significant differences between Hudson and Cruise
Control than how they integrate with Git.  We are currently switching
from Cruise Control to Hudson for reasons related to ease of use.

Here is another hudson/git plugin.  It may not be quite as official
but addresses issues people have had with the more official one:
http://github.com/stephenh/hudson-git2