From: Phillip Wood Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2018 21:12:53 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] sequencer.c: record revert/cherry-pick commit with trailer lines Message-ID: <1a667e9c-3944-4bc3-fb60-68e79dff0c34@talktalk.net> In-Reply-To: Hi Duy On 04/11/2018 17:41, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 5:45 PM Phillip Wood wrote: >> >> On 04/11/2018 07:22, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: >>> When a commit is reverted (or cherry-picked with -x) we add an English >>> sentence recording that commit id in the new commit message. Make >>> these real trailer lines instead so that they are more friendly to >>> parsers (especially "git interpret-trailers"). >>> >>> A reverted commit will have a new trailer >>> >>> Revert: >>> >>> Similarly a cherry-picked commit with -x will have >>> >>> Cherry-Pick: >> >> I think this is a good idea though I wonder if it will break someones >> script that is looking for the messages generated by -x at the moment. > > It will [1] but I still think it's worth the trouble. The script will > be less likely to break after, and you can use git-interpret-trailers > instead of plain grep. > > [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20181017143921.GR270328@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com/ > >>> @@ -1758,16 +1757,10 @@ static int do_pick_commit(enum todo_command command, struct commit *commit, >>> base_label = msg.label; >>> next = parent; >>> next_label = msg.parent_label; >>> - strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, "Revert \""); >>> - strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, msg.subject); >>> - strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, "\"\n\nThis reverts commit "); >>> - strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, oid_to_hex(&commit->object.oid)); >>> - >>> - if (commit->parents && commit->parents->next) { >>> - strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, ", reversing\nchanges made to "); >>> - strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, oid_to_hex(&parent->object.oid)); >>> - } >> >> As revert currently records the parent given on the command line when >> reverting a merge commit it would probably be a good idea to add that >> either as a separate trailer or to the Revert: trailer and possibly also >> generate it for cherry picks. > > My mistake. I didn't read carefully and thought it was logging > commit->parents, which is pointless. > > So what should be the trailer for this (I don't think putting it in > Revert: is a good idea, too much to parse)? Revert-parent: ? > Revert-merge: ? I think Revert-parent: is good, though you seem to have gone for including it the Revert: trailer in v2. >>> - strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, ".\n"); >>> + strbuf_addf(&msgbuf, "Revert \"%s\"\n\n", msg.subject); >> >> If the message already contains trailers then should we just append the >> Revert trailer those rather than inserting "\n\n"? > > Umm.. but this \n\n is for separating the subject and the body. I > think we need it anyway, trailer or not. Ah you're right, I had forgotten that the revert message body is empty, unlike cherry-pick where the message is copied (and that does the right thing already when there are existing trailers). Best wishes Phillip >>> @@ -1784,9 +1777,8 @@ static int do_pick_commit(enum todo_command command, struct commit *commit, >>> strbuf_complete_line(&msgbuf); >>> if (!has_conforming_footer(&msgbuf, NULL, 0)) >>> strbuf_addch(&msgbuf, '\n'); >>> - strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, cherry_picked_prefix); >>> - strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, oid_to_hex(&commit->object.oid)); >>> - strbuf_addstr(&msgbuf, ")\n"); >>> + strbuf_addf(&msgbuf, "Cherry-Pick: %s\n", >>> + oid_to_hex(&commit->object.oid)); > > I will probably make this "Cherry-picked-from:" to match our S-o-b style. >