From: Bill Lear <rael@zopyra.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:40:28 GMT
Subject: Re: Dangers of working on a tracking branch
Message-ID: <17876.57692.818802.89118@lisa.zopyra.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070215220918.GB27526@spearce.org>

On Thursday, February 15, 2007 at 17:09:18 (-0500) Shawn O. Pearce writes:
>...
>Lets say you patch git-clone to create these branches under
>refs/heads, and also under refs/remotes/origin.  Now someone else
>modifies one of those branches, and you do a git-fetch to get the
>latest.  The tracking branch under refs/remotes/origin would update,
>but not the one in refs/heads.  Which means "jumping right in" may
>actually cost you a lot more time, because you are now starting on
>something that is several days old.

Granted, but this would be the same as creating the branch by hand,
then going rock-climbing over the weekend, while my colleagues toiled,
and coming back on Monday to find 15 checkins on that branch, right?

At which point I could .... rebase?  Do a pull?


Bill