From: Juergen Ruehle <j.ruehle@bmiag.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:13:26 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-status: wording update to deal with deleted files.
Message-ID: <17832.2054.95000.756004@lapjr.intranet.kiel.bmiag.de>
In-Reply-To: <7vsleh16ey.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano writes:
 > If you do:
 > 
 > 	$ /bin/rm foo
 > 	$ git status
 > 
 > we used to say "git add ... to add content to commit".  But
 > suggsting "git add" to record the deletion of a file is simply
 > insane.
 > 
 > So this rewords various things:
 > 
 >  - The section header is the old "Changed but not updated",
 >    instead of "Changed but not added";
 > 
 >  - Suggestion is "git add ... to update what will be committed",
 >    instead of "... to add content to commit";
 > 
 >  - If there are removed paths, the above suggestion becomes "git
 >    add/rm ... to update what will be committed";
 > 
 >  - For untracked files, the suggestion is "git add ... to
 >    include in what will be committed".
 > 
 > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

I should have beaten you to it, since Michael had already noticed that
on wednesday, but I was too busy. Thanks.