From: Keller, Jacob E Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:58:07 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/8] submodule inline diff format Message-ID: <1472241486.28343.10.camel@intel.com> In-Reply-To: On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 12:17 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Jacob Keller om> wrote: > > > > > @@ -487,12 +490,14 @@ static void do_submodule_path(struct strbuf > > *buf, const char *path, > >                 strbuf_addstr(buf, git_dir); > >         } > >         if (!is_git_directory(buf->buf)) { > > +               gitmodules_config(); > > We determined via chat that calling gitmodules_config > is not harmful w.r.t. correctness, but might require some > improvements in the future for performance. > (i.e. we may want to add in a later series a >     if (already called gitmodules_config) >       set flag "already called gitmodules_config"; >       return; > into gitmodules_config) > > > > > > >  char *git_pathdup_submodule(const char *path, const char *fmt, > > ...) > >  { > > +       int err; > >         va_list args; > >         struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT; > >         va_start(args, fmt); > > -       do_submodule_path(&buf, path, fmt, args); > > +       err = do_submodule_path(&buf, path, fmt, args); > >         va_end(args); > > +       if (err) > > Here we need a strbuf_release(&buf) to avoid a memory leak? No, cause we "strbuf_detach" after this to return the buffer? Or is that not safe? Thanks, Jake > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html