From: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:50:30 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sha1: clean pointer arithmetic
Message-ID: <1347483030.1961.13.camel@test.quest-ce.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vd31rcck4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Le mercredi 12 septembre 2012 à 11:37 -0700, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
> Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com> writes:
> 
> > One memcpy() argument is computed from a pointer added to an integer:
> > eg. int + pointer. It's unusal.
> > Let's write it in the correct order: pointer + offset.
> 
> Meh.
> 
> Both are correct.  Aren't ctx->w[lenW] and lenW[ctx-w] both correct,
> even?
> 

"correct" in my commit log message should be read as "the way it's used
by most C developer".

It's again a cosmetic fix.

-- 
Yann Droneaud