From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:06:05 GMT
Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] [RFC] "clone --naked"?
Message-ID: <1137402365.3034.5.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
In-Reply-To: <7vfynoy5p5.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 23:47 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.DE> writes:
> 
> > On 14 Jan 2006 at 15:39, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >> BTW, I have been meaning to make this easier, by introducing a
> >> new option to "git clone", like this:
> > ...
> > You must be over 21 to use --naked, however ;-)
> > Maybe you find a better word.
> 
> Linus seems to use word "bare" sometimes.  Checking the git-core
> documentation, repository-layout documentation first used the
> word naked on Sep 1 2005, while there is no mention of "bare"
> repository anywhere.  Maybe "bare" is preferred?
> 
> I hope you do not mind my sending this message out to git list
> to take a quick poll.

While I don't give a rats bottom about the "21"-ness of naked, "naked"
is more likely to trigger spam traps than "bare" though... just a side
consideration but unfortunately needed nowadays ;(