From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 22:13:15 GMT
Subject: Re: Remove unneeded packs
Message-ID: <1131833595.25203.10.camel@blade>
In-Reply-To: <43766687.2000007@etek.chalmers.se>

Hi Lukas,

> > you are right. It is exactly what I was looking for. I just saw it some
> > minutes ago, when I pulled the latest git tree. However to make an old
> > GCC 2.95 happy, the attached patch is needed.
> > 
> > I am not sure if it is fully working. It deletes a lot of old packs, but
> > in case of the linux-2.6 tree it leaves on additional behind.
> > 
> > .git/objects/pack/pack-4d7682fb8230fef33eb518fa8e53885ec675795e.idx
> > .git/objects/pack/pack-4d7682fb8230fef33eb518fa8e53885ec675795e.pack
> > .git/objects/pack/pack-b3c6fbdfa36a326815de6358885c7a570a986b1b.pack
> > .git/objects/pack/pack-b3c6fbdfa36a326815de6358885c7a570a986b1b.idx
> > 
> > The 4d76... is the current pack, but the b3c6... is an old one that is
> > not needed anymore.
> 
> This is most likley because the pack b3c6... contains unreachable objects.
> git-pack-redundant only makes sure that all objects present in packfiles
> still are present in packfiles after the redundant packs have been removed.
> 
> Thus, unreachable objects will also be considered as required.
> 
> Note that I haven't checked if this is the cause in this particular case,
> but I have the same packfiles (I use the HTTP transport too).

maybe these packs are from a previous bad update. The cloned repository
I found it, is actually quite old. When I checked it with some others it
seems that it works perfect.

> I'm thinking of the possibility passing a list of objects to be ignored
> on stdin to git-pack-redundant. This would hopefully solve this problem.

Sounds good, but I don't even know what objects are involved in this
case and stops it from being marked as redundant.

Regards

Marcel