From: McMullan, Jason Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 13:29:09 GMT Subject: Re: Last mile for 1.0 Message-ID: <1118064550.8970.29.camel@jmcmullan.timesys> In-Reply-To: <7vzmu4weod.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 16:45 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I did not mention git-sync by Jason McMullan on my list of "what > I want to have in 1.0", but that was not because I object to the > idea of having a sync mechanism that knows and takes advantage > of how GIT works. Quite the contrary. > > [snip snip] > > I just do not feel, judging from its current protocol command > set, it offers enough improvements over what git-ssh-push/pull > pairs already give us; I'd be happy to be corrected, of course, > if this is a misconception. Oh, I definitely agree. git-sync is *not* 1.0 material. The protocol and feature set are still being worked on, and git-ssh-* may even be a better fix than git-sync for many scenarios. What I *do* want to get into git 1.0 is a merge of git-sync's verify-before-write update semantics into pull.c. I should be able to get that to you before tomorrow. -- Jason McMullan TimeSys Corporation