From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 19:06:38 GMT
Subject: Re: History messup
Message-ID: <1115665598.12012.422.camel@baythorne.infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <427FB3A7.8050906@zytor.com>

On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 12:01 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Seems like a UUID or a SHA-1 identifier would be better.
> 
> However, one can definitely argue that even the meaning of "a 
> repository" isn't well-defined in the context of git.

Of course it isn't. But neither is the meaning "a committer" or 
"an author" or even "a date".

Including some kind of repo-specific identifier with each commit would
help us to make sense of the history, just as those other fields do.

-- 
dwmw2