From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 18:05:54 GMT
Subject: Re: History messup
Message-ID: <1115661954.19236.44.camel@tglx>
In-Reply-To: <20050509170611.GJ24216@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>

On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 19:06 +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> If two repositories pull alternating from each other one has never the
> exact state the other has. They would play ping-pong and this is a bad
> thing. That was AFAIK the reason there is no COMMIT object introduced on
> 'head forward' merges.

That makes totaly sense, but for history tracking it is a horror
scenario, unless you dont have head history lists per repository or an
unique repository identifier in the commit blob itself.

tglx