From: Alexey Muranov <alexey.muranov@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:26:45 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] retain reflogs for deleted refs
Message-ID: <10DD3DE0-E554-4BE3-A20B-FDBC73219646@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8BtcvuW2HKPSki7meyHMsvpLS0b8QG5M_083HEwy=-9EQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 26 Jul 2012, at 14:47, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:

> So we haven't found any way to present both branches "foo" and
> "foo/bar" on file system at the same time. How about when we a new
> branch introduces such a conflict, we push the new branch directly to
> packed-refs? If we need either of them on a separate file, for fast
> update for example, then we unpack just one and repack all refs that
> conflict with it. Attempting to update two conflict branches in
> parallel may impact performance, but I don't think that happens often.
> -- 
> Duy

How about simply deprecating "/" in branch name?

-Alexey.