From: Remi Galan Alfonso <remi.galan-alfonso@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 11:32:08 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] strbuf: improve API
Message-ID: <1069084553.156626.1464607928755.JavaMail.zimbra@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20160530103642.7213-1-william.duclot@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr>

William Duclot <william.duclot@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
> This patch series implements an improvment of the strbuf API, allowing
> strbuf to use preallocated memory. This makes strbuf fit to be used
> in performance-critical operations.
> 
> The first patch is simply a preparatory work, adding tests for
> existing strbuf implementation.
> Most of the work is made in the second patch: handle pre-allocated
> memory, extend the API, document it and test it.

Seems interesting, however do you have any test/example that would
show the difference of performance between using these optimizations
and not using them?

Such values would make a nice addition to help convince people that
your series is interesting to have and use.

Thanks,
Rémi