From: Phillip Wood Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 15:42:00 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] doc: git-rebase: update discussion of internals Message-ID: <10372e00-3bb1-453a-bb62-332aaa935b24@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <105a65e6e7121ac6a9a8a1d0b4f3217495a9f5e7.1754702057.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> Hi Julia On 09/08/2025 02:14, Julia Evans via GitGitGadget wrote: > From: Julia Evans > > +Here is a more detailed description of what `git rebase ` does: > + > +First, it makes a list of all commits in the current branch that are not in > +``. This is the same set of commits that would be shown by `git log > +..HEAD`. The existing text is not quite accurate here, it should really say `git log --cherry-pick --right-only ...HEAD` as we drop any commits from the branch that have already been cherry-picked to . > You can use `--fork-point` or `--root` to change how this > +list of commits is constructed. `--reapply-cherry-picks` also changes how the list is constructed so I think it would be worth adding that option here as well. Thanks for working on this, it makes the description section much more readable. Phillip > + > +Then it checks out `` (or `` if the `--onto` option was > +supplied) with the equivalent of `git switch --detach `. > + > +Then it replays the commits, one by one, in order. This is similar to running > +`git cherry-pick ` for each commit. See REBASING MERGES for how merges > +are handled. > + > +Finally, it updates your branch to point to the final commit with the equivalent > +of `git switch -C `. > > [NOTE] > +`ORIG_HEAD` is set to point at the tip of the branch before the rebase. > `ORIG_HEAD` is not guaranteed to still point to the previous branch tip > at the end of the rebase if other commands that write that pseudo-ref > (e.g. `git reset`) are used during the rebase. The previous branch tip, > however, is accessible using the reflog of the current branch > (i.e. `@{1}`, see linkgit:gitrevisions[7]). > > -The commits that were previously saved into the temporary area are > -then reapplied to the current branch, one by one, in order. Note that > -any commits in `HEAD` which introduce the same textual changes as a commit > -in `HEAD..` are omitted (i.e., a patch already accepted upstream > -with a different commit message or timestamp will be skipped). > - > If the upstream branch already contains a change you have made (e.g., > because you mailed a patch which was applied upstream), then that commit > will be skipped and warnings will be issued (if the 'merge' backend is