From: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 15:28:27 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] symbolic-ref: teach "--[no-]recurse" option
Message-ID: <0d7707ba-5cfb-35a6-441f-06bf80053a72@iee.email>
In-Reply-To: <86355292-cb54-32c8-abf5-542fb4cf9ade@iee.email>

spelling correction

On 08/10/2022 13:28, Philip Oakley wrote:
> The existence of the `maint-xx` branches, and where they came from, was
> something that eluded me for a long time.
>
> The descriptions give the impression there is just a single main branch,

s/main/`maint`/ 
> with a singular name, and that was the end of it. It was only much later
> when some security patches were pushed down to numerous older `maint-xx`
> branches. The use of the singular `maint` is also used in examples a
> number of places further cementing the singular maintenance view.
>
> A few words clarifying the `maint` vs `maint-x.yy` branches could help
> users past the confusion.