From: Matthew DeVore Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:31:59 GMT Subject: [PATCH v9 3/8] list-objects: always parse trees gently Message-ID: <0d1285a0ec412846e5417ec524a866f6b2c39d82.1537561420.git.matvore@google.com> In-Reply-To: If parsing fails when revs->ignore_missing_links and revs->exclude_promisor_objects are both false, we print the OID anyway in the die("bad tree object...") call, so any message printed by parse_tree_gently() is superfluous. Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore --- list-objects.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/list-objects.c b/list-objects.c index ccc529e5e..f9b51db7a 100644 --- a/list-objects.c +++ b/list-objects.c @@ -143,8 +143,6 @@ static void process_tree(struct traversal_context *ctx, struct rev_info *revs = ctx->revs; int baselen = base->len; enum list_objects_filter_result r = LOFR_MARK_SEEN | LOFR_DO_SHOW; - int gently = revs->ignore_missing_links || - revs->exclude_promisor_objects; if (!revs->tree_objects) return; @@ -152,7 +150,7 @@ static void process_tree(struct traversal_context *ctx, die("bad tree object"); if (obj->flags & (UNINTERESTING | SEEN)) return; - if (parse_tree_gently(tree, gently) < 0) { + if (parse_tree_gently(tree, 1) < 0) { if (revs->ignore_missing_links) return; -- 2.19.0.444.g18242da7ef-goog