From: Jean-Noël Avila Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 12:46:39 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] doc: use only hyphens as word separators in placeholders Message-ID: <0b404448-cd4b-8614-2c49-c4683b56879f@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jean-Noël AVILA writes: > >> The choices here may be awkward; no problem to propose even more descriptive >> names. >> >>> Similarly "the 'format:' format" feels highly >>> redundant, I expect the reader knows that contains a format >>> inside it as it's mentioned immediately before *and* after. >>> >> The fact that it is a string doesn't tell you much about what you can do with >> it. For me, this isn't a problem that the explanation is redundant. > I agree that --format: is quite poor, as type alone does not > give readers any information on what it means and how it is supposed > to look like. Calling it does make quite a lot of > sense. > > It is a bit less obvious how much value we get out of , > though. In --opt= scheme of things, what comes after '=' are > all s, so does not clarify over like the > way clarifies over . > Agreed. Should reroll the patch series?