From: Kyle Moffett Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:08:42 GMT Subject: Re: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers Message-ID: <0C5DEAF8-11D3-4F12-9482-6DFEE099A392@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20050623235634.GC14426@waste.org> On Jun 23, 2005, at 19:56:34, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 06:24:54PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Things in git-land are moving at lightning speed, and usability has >> improved a lot since my post a month ago: http://lkml.org/lkml/ >> 2005/5/26/11 > > And here's a quick comparison with the current state of Mercurial.. Oooh!!! Nice!!! This is my new official source keeper for my next project. I especially like the fast operation and low disk storage requirements. Many kudos to Matt Mackall for his awesome program! The efficient network protocol is great too! Cheers, Kyle Moffett -- There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. -- C.A.R. Hoare