From: Phillip Wood Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:04:50 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] git-prompt: show presence of unresolved conflicts at command prompt Message-ID: <08a8e78d-7861-3da3-f6f6-bba466655071@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Hi On 15/08/2022 05:22, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Justin Donnelly writes: > >> I hope this is against protocol/etiquette, but after some initial >> feedback from Junio, I haven't gotten any more. I wasn't sure if >> nobody had seen the patch, or if there just wasn't any interest. > > It probably is a bit of both. I personally did not see much point > in adding the long "conflicts" marker to the shell prompt (I did > worry about possible complaints by end users triggered by seeing > them suddenly without asking, which was why I commented on the > patch) and I was waiting for interested folks to speak out. > > I do not know about other folks if they did see and did not find it > interesting, they are not looking at others' work, or your second > round came on a particularly bad day (busy with other topics, or > weekend just before the list was swamped with many new topics at the > beginning of a new week, or something). Pinging on the thread like > you did would be the right thing to do to "kick" those, who did see > and who were in favor but who kept silent, into action ;-) I had not commented as I don't use the prompt. I have just had a quick read and I wonder if it would be more efficient to use git diff --cached --quiet --diff-filter=U rather than git ls-files --unmerged 2>/dev/null to check if there are unmerged entries, but as we don't normally expect there to be that many unmerged entries it probably does not matter. Best Wishes Phillip