From: Mathias Kunter <mathiaskunter@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 17:06:25 GMT
Subject: git push doesn't use local branch name as default
Message-ID: <065528bf-b496-83d3-767d-2a78e50a9edf@gmail.com>

Hi all,

at https://git-scm.com/docs/git-push#_description it says:

> When neither the command-line nor the configuration specify what to
> push, the default behavior is used, which corresponds to the simple
> value for push.default: the current branch is pushed to the
> corresponding upstream branch, but as a safety measure, the push is
> aborted if the upstream branch does not have the same name as the local
> one.

However, on a branch which does *not* have an upstream branch 
configured, the command

> git push <remote_name>

doesn't use the local branch name as default, but fails with an error 
instead:

> fatal: The current branch master has no upstream branch.
> To push the current branch and set the remote as upstream, use
> 
> git push --set-upstream <remote_name> master

Note that it *does* work if the remote branch name is explicitly specified:

> git push <remote_name> <branch_name>

But shouldn't this also work without having to explicitly specify the 
remote branch name, and default to the local branch name instead?


[System Info]
git version:
git version 2.31.1.windows.1
cpu: x86_64
built from commit: c5f0be26a7e3846e3b6268d1c6c4800d838c6bbb
sizeof-long: 4
sizeof-size_t: 8
shell-path: /bin/sh
feature: fsmonitor--daemon
uname: Windows 10.0 19042
compiler info: gnuc: 10.2
libc info: no libc information available
$SHELL (typically, interactive shell): <unset>


[Enabled Hooks]