From: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:26:46 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC] Re: git-svn: make git-svn commit-diff able to work without explicit arguments
Message-ID: <052E1601-5422-48A0-81B3-9A454467CE5F@silverinsanity.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070102211339.GF17898@hades.madism.org>

>   The reason is simple, I often use git commit as :wq in my editor,  
> and
> sometimes think that in a A--B--C--D and in fact, I'd prefer to have:
>
>   {A,C}--B--D. how is it possible to do that in a not too cumbersome
> way? because that would make sens to work in some scratch branch, and
> then reorganize patches in a saner better way in the master branch.
>
>   But I fail to see how to achieve that without using cumbersome
> export-to-patch then git apply patch and edit logs which is painful  
> and
> not really using git.

The command you seem to be looking for is git-cherry-pick.  To  
combine the two commits, I'd do something like:

$ git cherry-pick A
$ git cherry-pick C
$ git reset HEAD~2
$ git add <files>
$ git commit

And then you could rebase the work branch on top of the new master,  
which should catch that A and C were already committed with minimal  
effort.  Of course there may be a cleaner way to do it, but this is  
what I do.

~~ Brian Gernhardt