From: Pranit Bauva Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:53:53 GMT Subject: [PATCH v14 05/27] t6030: explicitly test for bisection cleanup Message-ID: <01020156b73fe666-a66817f8-949c-46a0-9eb7-937c5ecd3629-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> In-Reply-To: <01020156b73fe5b4-5dc768ab-b73b-4a21-ab92-018e2a7aa6f7-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> Add test to explicitly check that 'git bisect reset' is working as expected. This is already covered implicitly by the test suite. Mentored-by: Lars Schneider Mentored-by: Christian Couder Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva --- I faced this problem while converting `bisect_clean_state` and the tests where showing breakages but it wasn't clear as to where exactly are they breaking. This will patch will help in that. Also I tested the test coverage of the test suite before this patch and it covers this (I did this by purposely changing names of files in git-bisect.sh and running the test suite). --- t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh index 5e5370f..18e7998 100755 --- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh +++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh @@ -894,4 +894,21 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect start takes options and revs in any order' ' test_cmp expected actual ' +test_expect_success 'git bisect reset cleans bisection state properly' ' + git bisect reset && + git bisect start && + git bisect good $HASH1 && + git bisect bad $HASH4 && + git bisect reset && + test -z "$(git for-each-ref "refs/bisect/*")" && + test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_EXPECTED_REV" && + test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK" && + test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_LOG" && + test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_RUN" && + test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_TERMS" && + test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/head-name" && + test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_HEAD" && + test_path_is_missing "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START" +' + test_done -- https://github.com/git/git/pull/287