From: rsbecker@nexbridge.com
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2026 14:35:07 GMT
Subject: RE: Git 2.54.0-rc0 Breaks on OpenSSL 3.0
Message-ID: <004301dcc5d2$942a5ac0$bc7f1040$@nexbridge.com>
In-Reply-To: <47629c96-8764-45f1-b36d-d944d6282cb1@web.de>

On April 6, 2026 3:07 AM, René Scharfe wrote:
>On 4/5/26 9:05 PM, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
>> Sadly, OpenSSL 3.0 is still out in the wild for those who have extended
>> support contracts with OpenSSL.
>
>https://openssl-library.org/policies/releasestrat/index.html says
>"Version 3.0 will be supported until 2026-09-07 (LTS)".
>
>> The following errors happen using OpenSSL
>> 3.0 when built with c99:
>>
>> "/home/jenkinsbuild/.jenkins/workspace/Git_Pipeline/imap-send.c", line 274:
>> error(252):
>>           argument of type "const X509_NAME_ENTRY *" is incompatible with
>>           parameter of type "X509_NAME_ENTRY *" (aka "struct
>> X509_name_entry_st
>>           *")
>
>This line contains:
>
>	    (cname = X509_NAME_ENTRY_get_data(cname_entry)) == NULL)
>
>https://docs.openssl.org/3.0/man3/X509_NAME_ENTRY_get_object/ gives its
>prototype as:
>
>ASN1_STRING *X509_NAME_ENTRY_get_data(const X509_NAME_ENTRY *ne);
>
>This has been matching the code since OpenSSL commit 9f5466b9b8
>(Constify some X509_NAME, ASN1 printing code, 2016-07-07).  git describe
>calls this commit OpenSSL_1_1_0-pre6-232-g9f5466b9b8.
>
>>                                      ASN1_STRING_get0_data(cname),
>> hostname);
>>                                      ^
>> "/home/jenkinsbuild/.jenkins/workspace/Git_Pipeline/imap-send.c", line 279:
>> error(114):
>>           identifier "ASN1_STRING_get0_data" is undefined
>
>https://docs.openssl.org/3.0/man3/ASN1_STRING_length/ gives its
>prototype as:
>
>const unsigned char *ASN1_STRING_get0_data(const ASN1_STRING *x);
>
>It was added by OpenSSL commit 17ebf85abd (Add ASN1_STRING_get0_data(),
>deprecate ASN1_STRING_data()., 2016-08-16).  git describe calls this
>commit OpenSSL_1_1_0-pre6-119-g17ebf85abd.
>
>Are you sure you use OpenSSL 3.0?  The errors suggest it's a rather
>older version (before 1.1.1).

Thanks Rene. Operator (me) error here. This was on the 1.0.2w build. We are disabling that
build now so that it will not get reported again.

Regards and thanks,
Randall