From: Ramsay Jones Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:11:07 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] sha1-file: provide functions to look up hash algorithms Message-ID: <000ff851-3068-36f0-4fff-1e69cd24cbec@ramsayjones.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <06e5bc95-b901-163a-5088-888878187ca2@gmail.com> On 13/11/2018 18:42, Derrick Stolee wrote: > On 11/4/2018 6:44 PM, brian m. carlson wrote: >> +int hash_algo_by_name(const char *name) >> +{ >> +    int i; >> +    if (!name) >> +        return GIT_HASH_UNKNOWN; >> +    for (i = 1; i < GIT_HASH_NALGOS; i++) >> +        if (!strcmp(name, hash_algos[i].name)) >> +            return i; >> +    return GIT_HASH_UNKNOWN; >> +} >> + > > Today's test coverage report [1] shows this method is not covered in the test suite. Looking at 'pu', it doesn't have any callers. > > Do you have a work in progress series that will use this? Could we add a test-tool to exercise this somehow? There are actually 4 unused external symbols resulting from Brian's 'bc/sha-256' branch. The new unused externals in 'pu' looks like: $ diff nsc psc 37a38,39 > hex.o - hash_to_hex > hex.o - hash_to_hex_algop_r 48a51 > parse-options.o - optname 71a75 > sha1-file.o - for_each_file_in_obj_subdir 72a77,78 > sha1-file.o - hash_algo_by_id > sha1-file.o - hash_algo_by_name $ The symbols from hex.o and sha1-file.o being the 4 symbols from this branch. I suspect that upcoming patches will make use of them. ;-) ATB, Ramsay Jones