{"thread":{"id":"9601","subject":"a475e8095aeb898c1ca60673b82df97d2300cc95 broken for docs","startedAt":"2007-08-21T17:51:35Z","lastAt":"2007-08-22T19:45:28Z","messageCount":11,"participants":["Randal L. Schwartz","Junio C Hamano","Mike Hommey","Shawn O. Pearce","David Kastrup"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"51187","messageId":"86odh0ojx4.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com","threadId":"9601","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"a475e8095aeb898c1ca60673b82df97d2300cc95 broken for docs","fromName":"Randal L. Schwartz","fromEmail":"merlyn@stonehenge.com","sentAt":"2007-08-21T17:51:35Z","receivedAt":"2007-08-21T17:51:35Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"merlyn@stonehenge.com","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/dc528d210743ff0333e6213f9ee7b33b23f1b7bc1f3c5a8c2d819074ecd7ab19?d=mp&s=160"},"body":"\nxmlto -m callouts.xsl man git-rev-list.xml\nxmlto: input does not validate (status 3)\n/Volumes/UFS/MIRROR/git-GIT/Documentation/git-rev-list.xml:512: element literal: validity error : Element emphasis is not declared in literal list of possible children\n/Volumes/UFS/MIRROR/git-GIT/Documentation/git-rev-list.xml:512: element literal: validity error : Element emphasis is not declared in literal list of possible children\n/Volumes/UFS/MIRROR/git-GIT/Documentation/git-rev-list.xml:512: element literal: validity error : Element emphasis is not declared in literal list of possible children\nDocument /Volumes/UFS/MIRROR/git-GIT/Documentation/git-rev-list.xml does not validate\nmake[1]: *** [git-rev-list.1] Error 3\nrm git-checkout.xml\nmake: *** [doc] Error 2\n\n\n-- \nRandal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095\n<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>\nPerl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.\nSee PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!\n"},{"id":"51201","messageId":"7vsl6coahd.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","threadId":"9601","inReplyTo":"86odh0ojx4.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com","subject":"Re: a475e8095aeb898c1ca60673b82df97d2300cc95 broken for docs","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"gitster@pobox.com","sentAt":"2007-08-21T21:15:26Z","receivedAt":"2007-08-21T21:15:26Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"I think we've seen it reported that docbook-xsl 1.72 and/or 1.73\nare broken.  Is your debug log from either of these versions?\n"},{"id":"51204","messageId":"86hcmso9ga.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com","threadId":"9601","inReplyTo":"7vsl6coahd.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","subject":"Re: a475e8095aeb898c1ca60673b82df97d2300cc95 broken for docs","fromName":"Randal L. Schwartz","fromEmail":"merlyn@stonehenge.com","sentAt":"2007-08-21T21:37:41Z","receivedAt":"2007-08-21T21:37:41Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"merlyn@stonehenge.com","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/dc528d210743ff0333e6213f9ee7b33b23f1b7bc1f3c5a8c2d819074ecd7ab19?d=mp&s=160"},"body":">>>>> \"Junio\" == Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:\n\nJunio> I think we've seen it reported that docbook-xsl 1.72 and/or 1.73\nJunio> are broken.  Is your debug log from either of these versions?\n\n1.71\n\n-- \nRandal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095\n<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>\nPerl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.\nSee PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!\n"},{"id":"51205","messageId":"20070821214505.GA12678@glandium.org","threadId":"9601","inReplyTo":"7vsl6coahd.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","subject":"Re: a475e8095aeb898c1ca60673b82df97d2300cc95 broken for docs","fromName":"Mike Hommey","fromEmail":"mh@glandium.org","sentAt":"2007-08-21T21:45:05Z","receivedAt":"2007-08-21T21:45:05Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"mh@glandium.org","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1038527?v=4"},"body":"On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 02:15:26PM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:\n> I think we've seen it reported that docbook-xsl 1.72 and/or 1.73\n> are broken.  Is your debug log from either of these versions?\n\nThe problems brought by docbook-xsl 1.72 are from a different nature.\nAlso note they only make a problem with the output, and don't break the\nbuild.\n\nMike\n"},{"id":"51210","messageId":"7v7inoo38o.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","threadId":"9601","inReplyTo":"86hcmso9ga.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com","subject":"Re: a475e8095aeb898c1ca60673b82df97d2300cc95 broken for docs","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"gitster@pobox.com","sentAt":"2007-08-21T23:51:51Z","receivedAt":"2007-08-21T23:51:51Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) writes:\n\n>>>>>> \"Junio\" == Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:\n>\n> Junio> I think we've seen it reported that docbook-xsl 1.72 and/or 1.73\n> Junio> are broken.  Is your debug log from either of these versions?\n>\n> 1.71\n\nInteresting.  I use 1.71 here too but it does not break.\n\nI wonder what the differences are between our environments\n(don't answer that you use OSX and I use Debian and FC -- that\nmuch I already know).\n"},{"id":"51213","messageId":"20070822014140.GK27913@spearce.org","threadId":"9601","inReplyTo":"7v7inoo38o.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","subject":"Re: a475e8095aeb898c1ca60673b82df97d2300cc95 broken for docs","fromName":"Shawn O. Pearce","fromEmail":"spearce@spearce.org","sentAt":"2007-08-22T01:41:40Z","receivedAt":"2007-08-22T01:41:40Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"spearce@spearce.org","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/34844?v=4"},"body":"Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:\n> merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) writes:\n> \n> >>>>>> \"Junio\" == Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:\n> >\n> > Junio> I think we've seen it reported that docbook-xsl 1.72 and/or 1.73\n> > Junio> are broken.  Is your debug log from either of these versions?\n> >\n> > 1.71\n> \n> Interesting.  I use 1.71 here too but it does not break.\n> \n> I wonder what the differences are between our environments\n> (don't answer that you use OSX and I use Debian and FC -- that\n> much I already know).\n\nIt broke at day-job on Cygwin today.  I don't know what version\nof docbook-xsl I'm using there.  But its fine on my OSX system.\nI had planned on debugging it at home tonight, but I can't reproduce\nit here.  Cute.  I will look at it again tomorrow and see if I can\ndebug the issue.\n\nI'm pretty sure it was my recent edit to git-rev-list.txt; its\none of the only commits that has impacted that manual page since\nthe last time I had built that manual on Cygwin.  And no, nothing\nelse (e.g. docbook, asciidoc, xmlto) has changed since the last\nsuccessful build.\n\n-- \nShawn.\n"},{"id":"51299","messageId":"857inom9z7.fsf@lola.goethe.zz","threadId":"9601","inReplyTo":"20070822014140.GK27913@spearce.org","subject":"Re: a475e8095aeb898c1ca60673b82df97d2300cc95 broken for docs","fromName":"David Kastrup","fromEmail":"dak@gnu.org","sentAt":"2007-08-22T05:09:16Z","receivedAt":"2007-08-22T05:09:16Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"dak@gnu.org","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/52141349?v=4"},"body":"\"Shawn O. Pearce\" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:\n\n> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:\n>> merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) writes:\n>> \n>> >>>>>> \"Junio\" == Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:\n>> >\n>> > Junio> I think we've seen it reported that docbook-xsl 1.72 and/or 1.73\n>> > Junio> are broken.  Is your debug log from either of these versions?\n>> >\n>> > 1.71\n>> \n>> Interesting.  I use 1.71 here too but it does not break.\n>> \n>> I wonder what the differences are between our environments\n>> (don't answer that you use OSX and I use Debian and FC -- that\n>> much I already know).\n>\n> It broke at day-job on Cygwin today.  I don't know what version\n> of docbook-xsl I'm using there.  But its fine on my OSX system.\n> I had planned on debugging it at home tonight, but I can't reproduce\n> it here.  Cute.  I will look at it again tomorrow and see if I can\n> debug the issue.\n>\n> I'm pretty sure it was my recent edit to git-rev-list.txt; its\n> one of the only commits that has impacted that manual page since\n> the last time I had built that manual on Cygwin.  And no, nothing\n> else (e.g. docbook, asciidoc, xmlto) has changed since the last\n> successful build.\n\nMaybe a line end character issue?\n\n-- \nDavid Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum\n"},{"id":"51225","messageId":"86veb8dobk.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz","threadId":"9601","inReplyTo":"20070822014140.GK27913@spearce.org","subject":"Re: a475e8095aeb898c1ca60673b82df97d2300cc95 broken for docs","fromName":"David Kastrup","fromEmail":"dak@gnu.org","sentAt":"2007-08-22T07:24:15Z","receivedAt":"2007-08-22T07:24:15Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"dak@gnu.org","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/52141349?v=4"},"body":"\"Shawn O. Pearce\" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:\n\n> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:\n>> merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) writes:\n>> \n>> >>>>>> \"Junio\" == Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:\n>> >\n>> > Junio> I think we've seen it reported that docbook-xsl 1.72 and/or 1.73\n>> > Junio> are broken.  Is your debug log from either of these versions?\n>> >\n>> > 1.71\n>> \n>> Interesting.  I use 1.71 here too but it does not break.\n>> \n>> I wonder what the differences are between our environments\n>> (don't answer that you use OSX and I use Debian and FC -- that\n>> much I already know).\n>\n> It broke at day-job on Cygwin today.  I don't know what version\n> of docbook-xsl I'm using there.  But its fine on my OSX system.\n> I had planned on debugging it at home tonight, but I can't reproduce\n> it here.  Cute.  I will look at it again tomorrow and see if I can\n> debug the issue.\n>\n> I'm pretty sure it was my recent edit to git-rev-list.txt; its\n> one of the only commits that has impacted that manual page since\n> the last time I had built that manual on Cygwin.  And no, nothing\n> else (e.g. docbook, asciidoc, xmlto) has changed since the last\n> successful build.\n\nLine ending problem?\n\n[P.S.: due to a stuck mail server at home, some message similar to\nthis one will appear in the evening]\n\n-- \nDavid Kastrup\n"},{"id":"51226","messageId":"7vir78j8ak.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","threadId":"9601","inReplyTo":"86odh0ojx4.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com","subject":"Re: a475e8095aeb898c1ca60673b82df97d2300cc95 broken for docs","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"gitster@pobox.com","sentAt":"2007-08-22T08:13:55Z","receivedAt":"2007-08-22T08:13:55Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"Is this only with \"make git-rev-list.1\"?\n\nCan your setup format d56651c0^ aka 14cd5607 correctly?  IOW, does\n\n\t$ git checkout 14cd5607 && cd Documentation && make git-rev-list.1\n\nwork well while\n\n\t$ git checkout a475e809 && cd Documentation && make git-rev-list.1\n\ndoesn't?\n"},{"id":"51258","messageId":"86odgzmx2z.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com","threadId":"9601","inReplyTo":"7vir78j8ak.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","subject":"Re: a475e8095aeb898c1ca60673b82df97d2300cc95 broken for docs","fromName":"Randal L. Schwartz","fromEmail":"merlyn@stonehenge.com","sentAt":"2007-08-22T15:02:28Z","receivedAt":"2007-08-22T15:02:28Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"merlyn@stonehenge.com","avatar":"https://gravatar.com/avatar/dc528d210743ff0333e6213f9ee7b33b23f1b7bc1f3c5a8c2d819074ecd7ab19?d=mp&s=160"},"body":">>>>> \"Junio\" == Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:\n\nJunio> \t$ git checkout 14cd5607 && cd Documentation && make git-rev-list.1\n\nThis works fine.\n\nJunio> \t$ git checkout a475e809 && cd Documentation && make git-rev-list.1\n\nAnd this fails.\n\n-- \nRandal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095\n<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>\nPerl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.\nSee PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!\n"},{"id":"51284","messageId":"7vveb7ic9z.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org","threadId":"9601","inReplyTo":"86odgzmx2z.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com","subject":"Re: a475e8095aeb898c1ca60673b82df97d2300cc95 broken for docs","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"gitster@pobox.com","sentAt":"2007-08-22T19:45:28Z","receivedAt":"2007-08-22T19:45:28Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"Thanks.  One difference we overlooked was the differences in\nversions of AsciiDoc; Quy sees problem with 8 while I do not\nwith 7 (both my private machine and k.org machine -- the latter\nof which is where preformatted documentation pages in html and\nman branches come from).  I think Shawn was correct to pinpoint\nthat exact change as the culprit and Quy Tonthat is on the right\ntrack, with this patch...\n\n\n\ndiff --git a/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt b/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt\nindex cbbc234..a0c611e 100644\n--- a/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt\n+++ b/Documentation/git-rev-list.txt\n@@ -298,8 +298,8 @@ used in the output.  When the starting commit is specified as\n 'commit@{now}', output also uses 'commit@\\{timestamp}' notation\n instead.  Under '\\--pretty=oneline', the commit message is\n prefixed with this information on the same line.\n-+\n-Cannot be combined with --reverse.\n+\n+Cannot be combined with '\\--reverse'.\n \n --merge::\n \n@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ By default, the commits are shown in reverse chronological order.\n --reverse::\n \n \tOutput the commits in reverse order.\n-\tCannot be combined with --walk-reflogs.\n+\tCannot be combined with '\\--walk-reflogs'.\n \n Object Traversal\n ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n"}]}