{"thread":{"id":"9169","subject":"git-apply versus git-am","startedAt":"2007-07-23T07:54:31Z","lastAt":"2007-07-23T17:37:59Z","messageCount":7,"participants":["Sean Kelley","Alex Riesen","Junio C Hamano","Timur Tabi","Johannes Schindelin","Peter Baumann"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"48279","messageId":"a2e879e50707230054m60d45293ua1d57887367914c1@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"9169","inReplyTo":null,"subject":"git-apply versus git-am","fromName":"Sean Kelley","fromEmail":"svk.sweng@gmail.com","sentAt":"2007-07-23T07:54:31Z","receivedAt":"2007-07-23T07:54:31Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"svk.sweng@gmail.com","avatar":null},"body":"Why doesn't git-apply include an option for a signoff line like git-am?\n\ngit-applymbox /tmp/mbox ~/.signoff\n\nOr am I missing something?  (most likely the case!)\n\nSean\n"},{"id":"48282","messageId":"81b0412b0707230131y666cff17vdcccb170b6034ca9@mail.gmail.com","threadId":"9169","inReplyTo":"a2e879e50707230054m60d45293ua1d57887367914c1@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: git-apply versus git-am","fromName":"Alex Riesen","fromEmail":"raa.lkml@gmail.com","sentAt":"2007-07-23T08:31:16Z","receivedAt":"2007-07-23T08:31:16Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"raa.lkml@gmail.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/324101?v=4"},"body":"On 7/23/07, Sean Kelley <svk.sweng@gmail.com> wrote:\n> Why doesn't git-apply include an option for a signoff line like git-am?\n>\n> git-applymbox /tmp/mbox ~/.signoff\n>\n> Or am I missing something?  (most likely the case!)\n>\n\ngit apply is just a safer patch(1). They serve different purpose.\n"},{"id":"48286","messageId":"7vsl7flctg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net","threadId":"9169","inReplyTo":"a2e879e50707230054m60d45293ua1d57887367914c1@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: git-apply versus git-am","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"gitster@pobox.com","sentAt":"2007-07-23T08:54:51Z","receivedAt":"2007-07-23T08:54:51Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"\"Sean Kelley\" <svk.sweng@gmail.com> writes:\n\n> Why doesn't git-apply include an option for a signoff line like git-am?\n>\n> git-applymbox /tmp/mbox ~/.signoff\n>\n> Or am I missing something?  (most likely the case!)\n\napplymbox is going away.\n"},{"id":"48320","messageId":"46A4E368.7080909@freescale.com","threadId":"9169","inReplyTo":"7vsl7flctg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net","subject":"Re: git-apply versus git-am","fromName":"Timur Tabi","fromEmail":"timur@freescale.com","sentAt":"2007-07-23T17:20:40Z","receivedAt":"2007-07-23T17:20:40Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"timur@freescale.com","avatar":null},"body":"Junio C Hamano wrote:\n\n> applymbox is going away.\n\nThat sucks!  I like git-am.  Is there a replacement command that applies a patch and \ncommits it at the same time?  If I use git-apply on a patch that adds new files, I need to \nuse git-add on the files before I can commit it.  That's a real pain.\n\n-- \nTimur Tabi\nLinux Kernel Developer @ Freescale\n"},{"id":"48322","messageId":"Pine.LNX.4.64.0707231834280.14781@racer.site","threadId":"9169","inReplyTo":"46A4E368.7080909@freescale.com","subject":"Re: git-apply versus git-am","fromName":"Johannes Schindelin","fromEmail":"johannes.schindelin@gmx.de","sentAt":"2007-07-23T17:34:47Z","receivedAt":"2007-07-23T17:34:47Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"johannes.schindelin@gmx.de","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/127790?v=4"},"body":"Hi,\n\nOn Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Timur Tabi wrote:\n\n> Junio C Hamano wrote:\n> \n> > applymbox is going away.\n> \n> That sucks!  I like git-am.\n\nRead it again.  Junio talked about applymbox, not am.\n\nCiao,\nDscho\n"},{"id":"48323","messageId":"20070723173756.GA4626@xp.machine.xx","threadId":"9169","inReplyTo":"46A4E368.7080909@freescale.com","subject":"Re: git-apply versus git-am","fromName":"Peter Baumann","fromEmail":"waste.manager@gmx.de","sentAt":"2007-07-23T17:37:56Z","receivedAt":"2007-07-23T17:37:56Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"waste.manager@gmx.de","avatar":null},"body":"On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:20:40PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:\n> Junio C Hamano wrote:\n>\n>> applymbox is going away.\n>\n> That sucks!  I like git-am.  Is there a replacement command that applies a \n> patch and commits it at the same time?  If I use git-apply on a patch that \n> adds new files, I need to use git-add on the files before I can commit it.  \n> That's a real pain.\n\n'git am' isn't going away, but as Junio mentioned, 'git applymbox' is.\nThose are two *different* programms doing roughly the same, but\n'git applymbox' is superceded by 'git am'.\n\n-Peter\n"},{"id":"48324","messageId":"46A4E777.8090301@freescale.com","threadId":"9169","inReplyTo":"Pine.LNX.4.64.0707231834280.14781@racer.site","subject":"Re: git-apply versus git-am","fromName":"Timur Tabi","fromEmail":"timur@freescale.com","sentAt":"2007-07-23T17:37:59Z","receivedAt":"2007-07-23T17:37:59Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"timur@freescale.com","avatar":null},"body":"Johannes Schindelin wrote:\n\n> Read it again.  Junio talked about applymbox, not am.\n\nSorry, for some reason I thought git-am is just a shortcut for git-applymbox.\n\n-- \nTimur Tabi\nLinux Kernel Developer @ Freescale\n"}]}