{"thread":{"id":"8122","subject":"Re: Rebase max-pack-size?","startedAt":"2007-05-12T22:57:31Z","lastAt":"2007-05-12T22:57:31Z","messageCount":1,"participants":["Junio C Hamano"],"isPatch":false,"patchVersion":null,"patchTotal":null},"messages":[{"id":"41979","messageId":"7vmz09veec.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net","threadId":"8122","inReplyTo":"56b7f5510705121325h65c62147h2b633fdddaece0be@mail.gmail.com","subject":"Re: Rebase max-pack-size?","fromName":"Junio C Hamano","fromEmail":"junkio@cox.net","sentAt":"2007-05-12T22:57:31Z","receivedAt":"2007-05-12T22:57:31Z","isPatch":false,"sender":{"key":"gitster@pobox.com","avatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/54884?v=4"},"body":"\"Dana How\" <danahow@gmail.com> writes:\n\n> Since max-pack-size has appeared, and disappeard, in \"pu\" twice\n> and never made it into \"next\",  I'm guessing I should rebase/merge it on\n> top of the other recent pack-objects work.  I may get to this tonight;\n> perhaps I'll send the patchset in one email with multiple attachments?\n\nI am still holding onto the series on its own topic branch, but\nmerging it to 'pu' and resolving conflicts seem pointless while\nI am (and hopefully the rest of the list ought to be ;-)\nprimarily concentrating on last-minute bugfixes in preparation\nfor v1.5.2.\n\nA rebase to be queued in 'next' would be good, though.\n\nThanks.\n"}]}